Return to Subject Index - Main Index
Flu Crimes at the
CDC
International
Medical Veritas Association
Mark
Sircus AC., OMD - director@imva.info
(The original article found on http://www.imva.info/index.html
The site does not appear to
be updated however there are several very interesting articles on mercury worth
reading.)
On the 7th of October, the BBC
started hitting the public with its yearly dose of hyped flu propaganda. “The
1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic is estimated to have infected up to one
billion people - half the world's population at the time. The virus killed more
people than any other single outbreak of disease, surpassing even the Black
Death of the Middle Ages.” One can only wonder at the vaccines in those early
days. Today in England, with the most modern technology, we have a vaccine plant
closing because of contamination. Imagine during the First World War when the
pharmaceutical companies first started mass producing the vaccines. At that
time refrigeration was chancier and vaccine manufacturing technology primitive.
Federal regulators said an inspection of Chiron's flu-vaccine plant in June
2003 turned up manufacturing problems, meaning they had ample warning of troubles
that over a year later remained unresolved. John Taylor, the FDA's associate
commissioner for regulatory affairs was correct in saying, last year, that “Chiron
wouldn't necessarily be able to discover problems, identify the root cause and
take steps to prevent similar issues from arising again.” Why would we assume
the early manufactures of almost 100 years ago would do any better?
Chiron’s Fluvirin vaccine was pulled off the market after the dangerous serratia bacteria was found in a manufacturing plant that uses the most up-to-the-minute safeguards. Chiron also uses the mercury-based preservative thimerosal as a sterilizing agent in making Fluvirin, to prevent exactly this type of contamination. Before the 1930s no such powerful preservative was available. It’s not beyond reason or statistical probability that the vaccines back then were contaminated or seriously flawed in some way and provoked the epidemic that killed so many. Dr. Eleanor McBean, who lived through the 1918 Influenza epidemic, testified, “As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the time. There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they had been vaccinated against.”
It is quite normal for the medical
establishment to bash the public with improbable stories of the past and carrot
stick them with future fears saying, “Scientists believe the 1918 virus leapt
to humans by mutating from bird flu, possibly after passing through pigs, which
are able to harbor both human and avian viruses and thus allow them to swap
genes as the viruses reproduce. For that reason, experts are deeply concerned
that the avian flu that has broken out in poultry flocks in parts of south-east
Asia may acquire genes that will make it highly infectious as well as lethal
for humans.” This kind of speculation is simply that, speculation, beliefs without
substance, good story line to scare naïve people with. We can as easily
believe that the vaccines themselves killed hundreds of thousands of people
because the pharmaceutical manufactures had not developed safeguards or sufficient
technology to assure quality control.
“Influenza kills tens of thousands
every year in this country and requires the hospitalization of about a quarter-million.
In epidemic years, mortality can be in the millions,” says Dr. Henry I. Miller,
a fellow at the Hoover Institution and former director of the Office of Biotechnology,
who seems not to have read the CDC’s version, which puts 1918 flu deaths at
only 500,000, the Asian Flu pandemic of 1957-58 at 70,000 and the Hong Kong
Flu pandemic of 1968-69 at 34,000. Medical authorities, the media and doctors
like Miller tend to have statistical hallucinations this time of year; but doctor
Miller goes on to suggest, “The FDA should also make it clear that although
the labeling for FluMist, the nasal vaccine, indicates that it is intended for
recipients aged 5 to 49 years, it will likely also be effective in those younger
or older.” FluMist was a disaster last year not only because it is expensive
but because it is dangerous and comes with warnings that those who use it can
become contagious for up to 21 days to those around them, because of it’s live
viruses. Miller, in some kind of manic need to sure up this year’s flu campaign,
would have it stuffed up the noses of babies even though the FDA has indicated
that this is not safe.
The CDC estimated that
from 1990 to 1999, an average of approximately 92
influenza-related deaths occurred each year among children less than 5
years of age.
It is clear, at least to
naturopathic doctors, that people and young children die from the flu not because
of the virus itself but because they are already sick, are bearing heavy toxic
burdens, and have severely compromised immune systems. Allopathic doctors like
Miller forget the most basic principles of health and disease because they do
not care to look into the realities of the patients they treat. They do not
want to take the time to understand weaknesses in patients because they are
eating too much sugar, are malnourished, are getting inadequate rest or if they
are suffering from intense emotional trauma. The flu salesmen doctors and the
CDC multiply the danger and risk of viruses because without exaggerated stories
flu vaccines just would not sell for the virus is not dangerous in and of itself.
The CDC deals with disease, not health. They would not stop and think that patients
who exercise would be better protected from the dangers of flu then from patients
who took vaccines.
Jeffrey A. Woods, PhD., and graduate student Tom Lowder at the Physical Fitness
Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois, Urbana recently
said just this, reporting that four consecutive days of moderate exercise in
mice after they were infected with influenza protects them from dying, compared
with mice that didn’t exercise. Woods and Lowder are reporting this October
of 2004 their findings at the American Physiological Society’s 2004 Intersociety
Meeting, showing that 20-week-old mice that had exercised had significantly
(p=0.008) higher survival rates (18 of 22) versus HCC of the same age (10 of
22). When all EX mice (47) were compared with all HCC mice (48), EX had twice
the survival rate, 59% vs. 29.4% (p=0.003). They reported that none of the variables
(food/water intake, random activity or symptom severity) proved to be reliable
at predicting mortality.
The CDC states that
135 children died during the 2003-2004 flu season.
59 of these children had received their flu shots.
It is just too much for the CDC to suggest that patients exercise and eat right.
They would rather promote vaccines that contain dangerous chemicals and inject
that in babies than promote health. Dr. Hugh Fundenburg, one of the most quoted
biologist of our time, says that if an individual has 5 consecutive flu shots
his/her chance of developing Alzheimer's Disease is 10 times greater than if
they had 1, two or no shots. What it will do to babies given year after year
is anyone’s guess and that is exactly what it is, a guess, an experiment, for
no one knows, for there have been no tests. Clearly no longitudinal study has
been made with babies on the effect of giving annual flu shots starting from
six months of age. With an already heavy childhood immunization schedule in
place, and with children carrying heavy burdens of toxins, including mercury
administered through other vaccines, it’s a crap shoot gamble on what will happen
to the children under the CDC’s rule with the addition of the flu vaccine that
contains thimerosal. Of course experimenting with children or anyone else is
against the laws of humanity and certainly a serious breach of medical ethics.
Executive Director
International Medical Veritas Association
http://www.imva.info
http://www.worldpsychology.net
Return to Top - Subject Index - Main Index